No of course not.

No of course not.

However, you shouldn’t get behind the wheel then, especially not as a former Justice Minister. This is exactly what Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger did and is now in need of an explanation. Former Federal Minister of Justice Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger has a problem. Because she was caught drunk behind the wheel, she is now threatened with a driving ban. “I had about 0.8 per mille,” said the FDP politician of “Bild”. “That was a big mistake.

It will not happen again. “She reckons with a month’s driving ban and a fine.” I accept that. “According to the report, the 63-year-old lawyer had celebrated Shrove Tuesday in Munich. She sat behind the wheel after a drink break of several hours “I thought I had broken down enough blood and alcohol in the meantime to be able to drive again,” she told the newspaper.Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger was Federal Minister of Justice from 2009 to 2013 and 1992 to 1996. She is currently on the board of the FDP-affiliated Friedrich Naumann Foundation. Source:, ghö / dpa “” “” “On the big stage: Christian Lindner on Saturday at the Epiphany in Stuttgart (Photo: imago / Jan Zawadil) Criticism is in the FDP is currently rare.

Ex-Justice Minister Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger called in a guest article in the “Süddeutsche Zeitung” on her party to show a clear edge against the right – and she apparently hit a nerve. In an interview with she talks about the reactions and explains how the FDP should position itself. Before the Epiphany, you spoke out in favor of a clear demarcation of the FDP from right-wing populist positions. How were the reactions in the party to your criticism? Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger was Federal Minister of Justice for eight years and has been a member of the FDP since 1978. (Photo: dpa) Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger: I received incredible support from the FDP, from previous colleagues from the Bundestag as well as from the party base at the Epiphany. Many told me that my statements reflected their feelings and that they were happy when there was a constructive discourse in the FDP.

The presidium, however, was not enthusiastic. FDP Vice Wolfgang Kubicki criticized you directly in the “Bild” newspaper and said that the statement shows how far the “former” are from the active politics of today’s FDP. If that is to say that we are no longer allowed to express ourselves, that is absurd. A muzzle for party friends is a joke, why did you admonish your party? It was a kind of caring from me. If you think that at one point or another there is a need for greater clarity – for example in refugee policy or on the subject of Europe – you have to get involved constructively and say: The FDP can be clearer there, must not allow any misunderstandings to arise and not disapprove of the AfD What is your concern that the FDP could move to the right?biology essay services I was a bit concerned by statements in recent interviews, both with regard to unaccompanied minor refugees and with regard to family reunification, which the party leadership does not want.

I am there for a more differentiated attitude, after all, joining can also contribute to integration. In the opposition it will now be important for the FDP to stand up for an open society, for Europe and against racism – which Christian Lindner did in his speech at the Epiphany. They also regret the end of Jamaica. Why? Jamaica would have been a new beginning.

You want something new in the new generation, not the old camels. In terms of civil rights in particular, we could certainly have made a difference that is no longer possible. In the opposition, you tend not to shape your professional skills, you can only set accents. In the event that the grand coalition does not come about, should the FDP try Jamaica again? No, of course not. We don’t need to speculate about that.

If Jamaica, as it was justified, did not work because of the lack of trust in the people involved, we don’t have to try a new edition six months later. And in a few years? I am always in favor of trying Jamaica again. At the federal level, however, there is still a long way to go. Is it only possible without Angela Merkel? I don’t believe in this debate at all. We don’t prescribe the staff to other parties, and they kindly don’t do that with the FDP either. That is why I think the discussion about who we want in place of Angela Merkel is really an unprofessional admission. How great is the regret in the FDP about the end of Jamaica? In the party there is a fairly solidified attitude that the termination of the Jamaica soundings was correct. However, there is criticism of the procedure and the far too long negotiations.

Probably after two and a half weeks you could have seen that nothing was going on and the conversation could have broken off. Ultimately, the whole system was wrong. We should have said from the start: Let’s identify three projects in which the partners find each other and develop their identity.

But they have to swallow a toad on other topics. But now it’s spilled milk. Gudula HörrQuelle: spoke with Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger “” Before the cabinet meeting, Heiko Maas and Thomas de Maizière need to speak. (Photo: dpa) What follows from the ECJ ruling that the directive on Data retention declared invalid? Justice Minister Maas from the SPD says Germany no longer needs to introduce any regulation. Interior Minister de Maizière from the CDU sees it differently: the Union and the SPD have drawn different conclusions from the ECJ ruling on data retention. Federal Minister of Justice Heiko Maas stated that with the ruling by the European Court of Justice against the EU directive, the basis for the new regulation of data storage in Germany as agreed in the coalition agreement was no longer applicable. “There is now no longer any reason to quickly submit a draft law,” said the SPD politician Maas. Federal Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, however, made it clear that he still saw a need for action. “I am pushing for a quick, intelligent, constitutional and majority-capable new regulation,” said the CDU man.

All experts agree that data retention “for the purpose of solving serious crimes” is necessary. De Maizière said the ECJ “could have done it the other way around”: it could have left the directive in force and stipulated necessary changes. Both ministers announced that they would review the ruling and agree on how to proceed with the respective coalition partner The ECJ had previously ruled that the EU data retention directive violates fundamental rights of citizens and must be reformed. Accordingly, the storage of connection data from telephone, Internet and e-mail without any suspicion must in future be “limited to what is absolutely necessary.” social relationships – without those affected knowing anything about it.

According to the judgment, this could “make citizens feel that their private life is the subject of constant surveillance”. The Luxembourg judges therefore come to the conclusion that the legislature exceeded the limits of proportionality when the 2006 directive was adopted . The collection of data for up to two years is not limited to what is absolutely necessary because it includes all citizens and electronic means of communication without any differentiation or exception. The judges also criticize that national authorities have unrestricted access to data and that access is not linked to specific criminal offenses or a judicial order. Although the European Court of Justice rejects the directive completely, it does not reject the principle of data retention. The judgment states that this “represents an objective serving the common good”. It helps in the fight against serious crime and serves public safety.

However, it is about the proportionality of the intervention. Data retention is highly controversial in the EU. In Germany there is currently no statutory regulation on this. The Federal Constitutional Court overturned the German requirements in 2010. The then black and yellow government could not agree on a new version.

In their coalition agreement, the Union and the SPD agreed to reintroduce data retention, which is intended to help solve serious crimes such as organized crime and terrorism. Investigators can access the collected data and know, for example, who called whom and when. The content of conversations is not saved. Source:, jog / AFP / dpa “According to diplomats, the EU states have given the green light to the controversial EU agreement with the US on the exchange of bank data. In addition to data protection officials, Federal Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger had concerns about the decision. The agreement was accepted with Germany, Austria, Hungary and Greece abstaining, said an EU diplomat at the meeting of EU interior ministers in Brussels.

There were no votes against. Another diplomat added that the transitional agreement will run for just nine months instead of the planned twelve months. (Photo: picture-alliance / dpa) Austria’s Interior Minister Maria Fekter had already announced that her government would abstain from the consultations in Brussels. However, the German position was unclear. The agreement is controversial in the federal government because of concerns about a lack of data protection. Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger continues to be critical, her spokesman said at the weekend. The agreement creates a legal basis for US terrorism investigators to continue to be able to access payment data from the global banking service provider Swift in the future.

The US authorities have been evaluating this information since 2002 in order to track down extremists and their sources of funding. Data protection has so far only been regulated to a limited extent. The new agreement became necessary because Swift relocated the server with European payment transfers from the USA to the Netherlands at the end of the year. Without a new agreement, US investigators would no longer have access to the data. It is disputed whether data protection is adequately secured. The German banks and savings banks criticized the fact that the bank customers affected were not able to adequately protect themselves from unwanted spying.

Inspection is also not expressly limited to Swift, and the data could be passed on to third countries without a data protection standard comparable to that in Europe. According to diplomats, however, the agreement does not allow data to be passed on to third countries. According to the schedule of the Swedish EU Council Presidency, the agreement should be signed immediately before the Lisbon Treaty comes into force tomorrow.

The European Parliament protested because under the new contract it would have more rights to information about the negotiations. Source:, dpa / rts “Not a bad result: Philipp Rösler. (Photo: dpa) The delegates of the FDP At party congresses in Rostock, their new chairman Rösler is elected with 95 percent of the vote. Vice Homburger, the former parliamentary group leader, received only 66 percent of the vote. Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger and Saxony’s party leader Zastrow occupy the other vice-posts. The FDP has elected Philipp Rösler as the new chairman with a large majority. At the party conference in Rostock, the new Minister of Economic Affairs, succeeding Guido Westerwelle, received 95.08 percent of the vote. 619 of the 651 delegates voted for him, 22 delegates against, and 10 abstained.

His three deputies were also elected. The 38-year-old Rösler is now to lead the party out of the crisis with a new team. With the election result, the delegates gave him the necessary support: It was better than the Westerwelles when he took office in 2001 (88.91). Foreign Minister Westerwelle had refrained from running again after ten years at the top of the party. Under internal pressure, he drew the consequences of the weakness of the party and the defeats in several state elections. FDP General Secretary Christian Lindner was confirmed in his office with a large majority.

The 32-year-old got 87.0 percent of the delegate’s votes. In his first election last year, the member of the Bundestag from North Rhine-Westphalia still received 95.6 percent. The party congress also elected the three future deputies of Rösler in the presidium: The former parliamentary group leader and Baden-Württemberg state chief Birgit Homburger achieved that with 66.1 percent worst result. Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, who stands for the party’s civil rights profile, received 85.51 percent. The best result among the deputies was achieved by Saxony’s FDP state chief Holger Zastrow with 89.35 percent. Patrick Döhring, who comes from Hanover like Rösler, was elected to succeed the outgoing Hermann-Otto Solms as treasurer.

The Hessian state chief Jörg-Uwe Hahn was elected as an assessor in the presidium with just over 52 percent. The vice-prime minister of the black-and-yellow state government in Wiesbaden had repeatedly received sharp criticism of the party leadership under Guido Westerwelle in recent months, and it was also decided that there will continue to be no women quota in the occupation of party offices. With a very large majority, the delegates rejected a corresponding proposal from the party’s Federal Association of Liberal Women. She wanted to ensure that at least 40 percent of party posts must be held by women. 105 delegates voted in favor of this move, 407 rejected it. The party leadership wanted to avoid a vote on the sensitive issue and have the request referred to the statutes committee because of formal errors.

At just under 23 percent, the FDP has a particularly low proportion of women compared to other parties. Source:, dpa “It is and is not going ahead. (Photo: dpa) The Greek right’s no to the government agreement with the international Lenders have rekindled investors’ fears of Greece going bankrupt, with the euro dropping to $ 1.3153 on the foreign exchange market, losing more than a cent and a half to its two-month high from the previous day.